Abstract:
Becoming a public company is a significant milestone in the life cycle of a company.
There are noticeable factors behind the going public decision of firms. The factors
have been identified and then established as theories in literature: cost-benefit
hypothesis. The review of literature reveals that companies get the going public
decision based on a tradeoff between the cost and benefit of going public. However,
some of such benefits can be attainable as being a private company too rather than
a public company. This study is intended to critically analyze each benefit outlined
in theory to evaluate the viability of the benefit in practice as being a public
company. In order to achieve the objective of this study, each benefit stated, in
theory, is critically analyzed, whether it can be realizable through being solely a
public company rather than a private company based on the findings of previous
empirical studies in different markets and in different periods. Therefore, the
commonly identified benefits of going public in the previous empirical studies are
listed and then each of the benefits is evaluated whether it can be attainable as being
a private company or as being a public company. Based on the critical elevation, it
was revealed that raising funds from the general public was not the prime purpose
of going public decision as stated in the face of Initial Public Offering (IPO). This
finding may encourage future research in this area to find interesting facts about
IPO.
