dc.description.abstract |
The world is facing many challenges and some of them directly relates to the survival of the mankind.
The environment is degrading at rates never seen before and this is one such question that has created
a discourse on the protection of the environment at a global level. For a small country like Sri Lanka
with riches of environmental beauty and the bio-diversity, the degrading of its environment has causes
serious concerns. One can argue that, this could be due to the lack of a justiciable right to a healthy
environment meaning that no one as of a right can claim for a healthy environment. The fundamental
rights chapter found in the 1978 Constitution of the Democratic Socialist republic of Sri Lanka does not
have provisions to protect the environment under it and while the directive principles recognizes the importance of the environment and the corresponding duties of the citizens of the country to protect and
safeguard it, it is however, not justiciable meaning not enforceable in a Court of law. In this backdrop,
the mechanism of judicial review which strikes out arbitrary decisions of the governmental authorities
have facilitated the lack of constitutional provisions regarding environmental protection. This paper examines how and to what extent the Sri Lankan Courts have been successful in achieving this target
through the use of judicial review. |
en_US |