Abstract:
Reporting on sustainability practices has become popular among firms to secure its own image
in the society as a legitimate corporate citizen. The level of disclosure might be determined
by the attention given by board governance characteristics towards it but may be subject to the
performance attainment and resource availability of the firms. Thus, this study was designed
to investigate the association between board characteristics and the level of sustainability disclosures with the moderating effect of the performance achievement and resources available.
Accordingly, the first objective of the study was to measure the level of board governance characteristics and sustainability disclosure in Sri Lanka; secondly, to examine the association between board characteristics and level of sustainability disclosures, and finally to investigate
the moderating impact of the performance gap (attainment discrepancy) and resources (slacks).
Eleven prominent board characteristics as independent variables together with seven controlling variables were utilized in this study. All the manufacturing companies in Colombo Stock
Exchange were selected amounting to 28 for four years period (2014 to 2017) and thereby one
hundred and twelve (112) firm-year observations have been used in the study. Using Global
Reporting Initiative (GRI) based index for measuring sustainability disclosures, results indicate
that the level of sustainability reporting is not at satisfactory level in Sri Lanka since the overall
mean was found to be 46.29%. Under the correlation and ordered logistic regression analysis,
audit committee size (p < 0.1), audit committee meetings (p < 0.01) and short CEO tenure
(p < 0.05) become significant predictors for sustainability reporting which affect positively,
while surprisingly having female directors become negatively significant (p < 0.05). It was
found that neither performance gaps nor resources available within firms moderate the relationship between board characteristics and sustainability reporting. These results are supported by
Agency theory, Legitimacy theory and Behavioral theory of firm. The study contributes to the
extant literature by filling the empirical gap prevailed in the study area. The study is expected
to have significant policy implications for regulators and policymakers on corporate voluntary
disclosures.
