Abstract:
Sport tourism has become a key strategy for many
countries in adding more value to their tourist destination
during last decade. Sport tourism is widely categorized in
three folds by scholars and practitioners: 1) active sport
tourism 2) sport event tourism and 3) nostalgia sport
tourism. First, active sport tourism is athletes travel to
destination and actively participate or play sport by
themselves such as marathon running, trail running, doing
adventure sport, etc. Second, sport event tourism is individual travel to destination
to be attendance or spectator of the events such professional sporting event or
major elite sporting event. Third, nostalgia sport tourism is tourists who travel to
destination for appreciate famous or iconic sporting venue or commemorate past
experience.
Before the COVID-19 pandemic, more countries attempted to add value to tourism
industry by using sporting events either major sporting events or active sport
events. The benefit for organizing an annual sport tourism event in tourist
destination can increase sport tourist retentions. In general, tourists normally look
for new destinations to visit rather than return to the same place. Sport
participation in that destination becomes an important reason for their revisits.
The major benefit for sport tourism is to draw new money from sport tourists to
local area. From economic impact assessment principle, three major impacts 1)
direct impact 2) indirect impact and 3) induced impact are key components in
motivating the city leader to run sport tourism activities. Direct impact includes
direct spending by participants, spectators, event organizers on goods and services
inside event venues (food and beverage, retail, and others) and outside venues
(accommodation, food and beverage, retail, transport, entertainment, tours and
other). Indirect impact typically measures the value of additional economic
demands that sport organizer places on supplying industries in the region. When
organizers hold a sporting event, they must make many direct purchases from
suppliers in the area. Third, Induced impacts are the increased sales within the
region from household spending of the income earned in sport tourism activity
and supporting industries. Employees in sport tourism and supporting industries
spend the income they earn from sport tourism on housing, utilities, groceries, and
other consumer goods and services. Hosting sport tourism event not only bring economic impact in monetary benefit
but also job creation during the event. However, there are a number of criticisms
from the scholars that most jobs from sport tourism events are generally merely
temporary jobs. The incomes for temporary workers are only increasing wage for
the duration of event and event preparation.
Economists also consider tax collected from organizers and local businesses is the
impact from hosting sport tourism event. Media values are also another
measurement for sport tourism event impact. However, active sport tourism and
nostalgia sport tourism are not covered by mass media. Only the mega sport event
tourism such as international games, World championships, or professional sport
events can draw international visitors and international media.
Recently, governments started to increase attention to social impact,
environmental concern and also legacy to local community, for instance, local
sport development. Although sport tourism can generate good effects to city and
local community, the negative impact also come with benefits. Scholars also
pointed out that cost benefit analysis (CBA) may be used alongside with economic
impact assessment to justify reason for city to run sport tourism project.