Sabaragamuwa University of Sri Lanka

Evaluating Environmental Sustainability in Concrete Mix Design using Non-Conventional Fine Aggregates: River Sand vs Manufactured Sand Scenarios

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Vijerathne, D.
dc.contributor.author Wahala, W.M.P.S.B.
dc.contributor.author Illankoon, C.
dc.contributor.author De Silva, N.
dc.date.accessioned 2024-12-12T06:44:53Z
dc.date.available 2024-12-12T06:44:53Z
dc.date.issued 2023-12-05
dc.identifier.citation 13th Annual Research Session of the Sabaragamuwa University of Sri Lanka en_US
dc.identifier.isbn 978-624-5727-41-4
dc.identifier.uri http://repo.lib.sab.ac.lk:8080/xmlui/handle/susl/4625
dc.description.abstract The construction industry heavily relies on materials, mainly concrete, posing environmental challenges. To address this, 'greener' concrete options have emerged, aiming to reduce reliance on new materials. Concrete grades are pivotal, determined by mix designs based on compressive strength. Cement, fine and coarse aggregates, water, and sometimes admixtures constitute concrete. Incorporating non-conventional materials, like quarry dust, seeks to create more eco-friendly concrete but lacks comprehensive life cycle inventory (LCI) data for ready-mix concrete. This study conducts a 'cradle-to-use' life cycle assessment (LCA) of two concrete types: one with conventional river sand and another blending river sand with quarry dust, both meeting the 30 MPa strength standard. Data from a quarry and batching plant are collected for environmental impact assessment, considering material, water, electricity consumption, and waste generated over two months. SimaPro Faculty version models the environmental impact per m3 for both concrete types using ReCiPe 2016 v1.1 mid-point and end-point characterization models. End-point analysis reveals lower human health impact for the non-conventional concrete (0.0538 Pt) compared to conventional (0.0762 Pt). Among 18 mid-point categories, "human carcinogenic impact" ranks the highest for both concrete types, with the non-conventional showing reduced impact (0.938 Pt) compared to conventional (1.27 Pt). Notably, clinker production remains the primary source of environmental impact for both, followed by electricity consumption during cement production. Replacement of fine aggregate shows a modest reduction in environmental impact. The study underscores the significantly lower environmental impact of non conventional fine aggregates, particularly quarry dust. This establishes the non conventional mix as a more environmentally friendly choice among the two concrete scenarios. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship ATA INTERNATIONAL LTD and Ceydigital en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Sabaragamuwa University of Sri Lanka, Belihuloya. en_US
dc.subject Greener concrete en_US
dc.subject Life cycle assessment en_US
dc.subject Fine aggregate en_US
dc.subject Quarry dust en_US
dc.subject River sand en_US
dc.title Evaluating Environmental Sustainability in Concrete Mix Design using Non-Conventional Fine Aggregates: River Sand vs Manufactured Sand Scenarios en_US
dc.type Other en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • ARS 2023 [89]
    Abstracts of the 13th Annual Research Session, Sabaragamuwa University of Sri Lanka

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account